Example study · Organization science, Information systems
Example: a systematic review of algorithmic management studies
What does the empirical literature find about algorithmic management and worker autonomy?
Example: invented check results. All 17 files unchanged since the run, 58 of 61 references found. Details
Private The files are not shared. Published version: Example Review of Economics (example, no link), may be behind a paywall. Dossier 2dcda4cacb73f8e3
Published 2027-02-18 · CC-BY-4.0
Where it sits
left: what it builds on · right: what builds on it · pale: exampleContributed by Jun Sato (example)
How studies reach it
No published study reaches it yet.
Disciplines it reaches
No study reaches it yet.
Solid: published studies. Light: examples.
Computed from the records on this site: what each study, template and specialist names as used, which study extends which, and who contributed what. 0 studies in total.
What was checked
Example: invented check resultsEverything in this box is invented to show how checks read. See the checks of the real published study.
Checked by E2ER
- ✓The study's fingerprint matches its list of files (version example)
- ✓17 of 17 files downloaded from GitHub
2027-03-15 10:00 UTC
Reported by the author's own check
- ✓integrity 17 files hash-verified against provenance.json
- ○numbers no computed tables in this study
- ✓citations 61 cite key(s) resolve in refs.bib; snapshot: 58 verified, 3 unverifiable at run time
e2er verify at publish, offline
How it was produced
- 0 data files
- 61 references
- template Systematic review
- 0 specialists (declared)
- 2 result files
- 4 paper files
- 0 replication files
From the study's own records of how each file was produced.
What this object would record
ExampleDesign
- ·Protocol declared before the search
- ·Search in two bibliographic databases
- ·Screening by two specialists, conflicts to a human
Checks it would pass
- ✓Every screening decision recorded with its reason
- ✓Every citation resolves to an existing publication
- ✓Every claim about a study points to a verbatim passage
Evidence package
Contributors
People
- ·Jun Sato · github:jun-sato · orcid:0000-0000-0000-0005 (conceptualization, investigation)
AI
Example: no model calls.
What it was built with
Each template, specialist and skill has its own page and its own authors. Use any of them in your next run; their authors are credited.
Template
Derived from
No recorded parent object.
Reused in
No other study builds on this one yet.
Literature (61) Example · cited in the paper, each resolved against a bibliographic database
- ✓Example2025a · openalex
- ✓Example2025b · openalex
- ✓Example2013c · crossref
- ✓Example2023d · openalex
- ✓Example1997e · openalex
- ✓Example1999f · crossref
- ✓Example2015g · crossref
- ✓Example2005h · openalex
- ✓Example2017i · crossref
- ✓Example2018j · crossref
- ✓Example2015k · crossref
- ✓Example2001l · crossref
- ✓Example1999m · crossref
- ✓Example2013n · crossref
- ✓Example2022o · crossref
- ✓Example1996p · crossref
- ✓Example2003q · crossref
- ✓Example2021r · crossref
- ✓Example2007s · crossref
- ✓Example2024t · crossref
- ✓Example2024u · openalex
- ✓Example2024v · crossref
- ✓Example2003w · openalex
- ✓Example2001x · openalex
- ✓Example2006y · openalex
- ✓Example2013z · crossref
- ✓Example1998a · openalex
- ✓Example2023b · crossref
- ✓Example2008c · openalex
- ✓Example2013d · crossref
- ✓Example2016e · openalex
- ✓Example2004f · openalex
- ✓Example1997g · openalex
- ✓Example2002h · crossref
- ✓Example2008i · openalex
- ✓Example2012j · openalex
- ✓Example1998k · crossref
- ✓Example2009l · crossref
- ✓Example2015m · crossref
- ✓Example2002n · openalex
- ✓Example1996o · crossref
- ✓Example2011p · openalex
- ✓Example2006q · crossref
- ✓Example2004r · crossref
- ✓Example2008s · crossref
- ✓Example2021t · openalex
- ○Example2011u
- ○Example2020v
- ✓Example1998w · crossref
- ✓Example2010x · crossref
- ✓Example2022y · openalex
- ✓Example2017z · crossref
- ✓Example2019a · openalex
- ✓Example2009b · crossref
- ✓Example2006c · crossref
- ✓Example2004d · crossref
- ✓Example2025e · crossref
- ✓Example2022f · crossref
- ✓Example2003g · crossref
- ○Example2008h
- ✓Example2023i · openalex
Data and outputs (8 files with fingerprints) Example
Description
Data model- Discipline
- Organization scienceInformation systems
- Method family
- Literature review
- Design
- not specified
- Research stage
- not specified
- Contributors
- Jun Sato (Conceptualization, Investigation)
- Usage
- not used in published research yet
- Source
- Example
- Record
- run:jun-sato/algorithmic-management-review · JSON
Solid tags are declared by the source or mapped from its terms; dashed tags are inferred by a published rule. Hover a tag for its provenance.
Knowledge contributions
Written into the paper · plannedOne reference for E2ER, linking to the study's dossier; the people behind every part are listed under Contributors.
This paper was produced with E2ER. The templates, specialists, skills and connectors it used, their authors and their exact versions are listed in its dossier (e2er.org/d/2dcda4cacb73f8e3).
| Contributor | Building blocks | Roles |
|---|---|---|
| E2ER contributors | Systematic review | Conceptualization |
\section*{Knowledge contributions}
This paper was produced with E2ER~\citep{e2er-2dcda4cacb73f8e3}. The templates, specialists, skills and connectors it used, their authors and their exact versions are listed in its dossier.@misc{e2er-2dcda4cacb73f8e3,
title = {E2ER dossier for "Example: a systematic review of algorithmic management studies"},
author = {{E2ER}},
year = {2027},
howpublished = {\url{https://e2er.org/d/2dcda4cacb73f8e3}},
note = {Workflow, templates, specialists, skills, connectors and models used, pinned by content hash. Dossier sha256:2dcda4cacb73f8e3a244c446ac21ecb46b9e215a50ab4db660d671232ab9ecf7}
}