External pipelines · RISE project catalogue
Reviewer (Ingar30)
A reproducible multi-agent reviewer for academic economics papers. Takes a PDF as input, runs a fixed set of mandatory reviewers plus dynamically-selected optional reviewers, validates their JSON output against schemas, deduplicates findings, and assembles a final editor report. Sits firmly in the referee-simulation stage of the RISE pipeline.
Where it sits
left: what it builds on · right: what builds on it · pale: exampleContributed by Ingar30
How studies reach it
No published study reaches it yet.
Disciplines it reaches
No study reaches it yet.
Solid: published studies. Light: examples.
Computed from the records on this site: what each study, template and specialist names as used, which study extends which, and who contributed what. 0 studies in total.
What it does
Treats peer review as a structured engineering problem with explicit schemas, validation, parser-quality preflight, and editor-bundle assembly — distinguishing itself from chat-style review assistants. Reviewer prompts and orchestration are open and reproducible; review outputs are kept private by default.
- Focus
- review
- Inputs
- submitted-paper-pdf
- Outputs
- editor-report, reviewer-json, parser-artifacts
- Architecture
- multi-agent, dag-orchestration, tool-use, artifact-versioning
- Maintained by
- Ingar30
- Started
- 2026
Description
Data model- Discipline
- Economics
- Method family
- not specified
- Design
- not specified
- Research stage
- Review
- Contributors
- Ingar30
- Usage
- not used in published research yet
- Source
- RISE project catalogue · projects/landscape · @4c17bae
- Record
- pipeline:reviewer · JSON
Solid tags are declared by the source or mapped from its terms; dashed tags are inferred by a published rule. Hover a tag for its provenance.
Bring it into the standard
A pipeline built outside E2ER can meet the standard by describing its steps as a template, attaching the floor of checks and publishing evaluation records. Its authors keep ownership and credit.