Specialists · Theory lab · Tier 6 · Social Sciences & Humanities
Political Science
“Who governs? How is power distributed? Whose interests are served?”
Written for researchers in Political Science
If you work in this field, edit this specialist: its diagnostic question, the canonical models it reasons from and the biases it should watch for. Your name is credited on it and on every study that uses it.
Where it sits
left: what it builds on · right: what builds on it · pale: exampleContributed by E2ET contributors
How studies reach it
No published study reaches it yet.
Disciplines it reaches
No study reaches it yet.
Solid: published studies. Light: examples.
Computed from the records on this site: what each study, template and specialist names as used, which study extends which, and who contributed what. 0 studies in total.
Canonical models
- ·Collective action logic (Olson, 1965)
- ·Institutional analysis (Ostrom, 2005)
- ·Power and hegemony (Lukes, 1974; Gramsci, 1971)
- ·Selectorate theory (Bueno de Mesquita et al., 2003)
Known biases
- !Power-centric framing even for apolitical phenomena
- !May conflate governance with government
From src/theory_lab/persona_roster.py. The persona's full skill is the skill theory_lab/personas/tier6_social_humanities/political_science, catalogued in RISE: political_science.
Where it works
Description
Data model- Discipline
- Social sciencesHumanities
- Method family
- Theoretical
- Design
- not specified
- Research stage
- Hypotheses
- Contributors
- E2ET contributors (Software, Methodology)
- Usage
- not used in published research yet
- Source
- E2ET theory lab (local) · src/theory_lab/persona_roster.py
- Record
- agent:e2et/persona/political_science · JSON
Solid tags are declared by the source or mapped from its terms; dashed tags are inferred by a published rule. Hover a tag for its provenance.