Templates · paper-review
Paper review
Six reviewer specialists review a paper in parallel after a number check and a citation check; a three-rule verdict merges their reports.
PlannedRuns today as the review phase of the empirical template; running it on its own is plannedreview
0
published studies reach it
+ 0 example
0
records that use it directly
+ 0 example
0
researchers behind those studies
real and example
7
things it builds on directly
Where it sits
left: what it builds on · right: what builds on it · pale: example study template specialist skill connector dataset researcher creator
Contributed by E2ER contributors
How studies reach it
No published study reaches it yet.
Disciplines it reaches
No study reaches it yet.
Solid: published studies. Light: examples.
Computed from the records on this site: what each study, template and specialist names as used, which study extends which, and who contributed what. 0 studies in total.
- Input
- A paper with the result files and bibliography it was written from
- Output
- Six reviewer reports and a verdict (accept, minor or major revision, reject)
Description
Data model- Discipline
- General
- Method family
- Review
- Design
- not specified
- Research stage
- Review
- Contributors
- E2ER contributors (Software, Methodology)
- Usage
- not used in published research yet
- Source
- E2ER repository · src/core/strategist/runner.py · @3b91f0e
- Record
- template:paper-review · JSON
Solid tags are declared by the source or mapped from its terms; dashed tags are inferred by a published rule. Hover a tag for its provenance.
Steps
- 1 checknumber checkEvery number in the tables is compared with the result file it came from; failures block the review.
- 2 checkcitation checkEvery citation must resolve in the bibliography and in OpenAlex, Semantic Scholar or Crossref.
- 3 specialists, parallelreviewEach reviewer writes its own report: mechanism, technical, literature, writing, data and identification. The data reviewer is skipped for theoretical papers.
- 4 checkverdictThree rules: a mechanism score below 5 fails the paper; any score below 4 rejects it; otherwise a weighted average decides (technical and identification weigh most).
Versions and evaluations
PlannedNo versions yet.
Connectors this template can use
What a run of this template can reach outside your machine, and what each sends out.
Checks on this template
- ✓Output contracts · Every step produced the artifact it declared, in the declared form
Required of every template. - ✓Execution reliability · Analysis code ran and wrote a parseable, non-empty result
Required of every template. - –Numbers · Every number in tables and text matches the output of executed code
Not applicable. This method produces no computed numbers to match. - ○Citations · Every reference resolves to an existing publication via OpenAlex, Semantic Scholar or Crossref
Proposed. Proposed for the floor; runs log it but may not block on it. - ○Verbatim passages · Every claim about a source points to a passage found word for word in that source
Proposed. Proposed for the floor; runs log it but may not block on it.
Runs of this template
No runs yet.