Specialists · Review panel
technical_reviewer
E2ER gives this specialist no role sentence of its own. It shares the generated specialist prompt and is defined by its skills and the artifact it must write.
Where it sits
left: what it builds on · right: what builds on it · pale: exampleContributed by E2ER contributors
How studies reach it
- No Cash Flows, New Owners: Spot Bitco… → technical_reviewer
- Digital credit scores and lending to … → Empirical → technical_reviewerExample
- Stablecoins and the cost of remittanc… → Empirical → technical_reviewerExample
- Remote work and promotion chances → Empirical → technical_reviewerExample
- Mobile money and household savings in… → Staggered difference-in-differences (… → Empirical → technical_reviewerExample
- Data-sharing mandates and hospital IT… → Staggered difference-in-differences (… → Empirical → technical_reviewerExample
and 13 more
Disciplines it reaches
Solid: published studies. Light: examples.
Computed from the records on this site: what each study, template and specialist names as used, which study extends which, and who contributed what. 19 studies in total.
Output contract
The run checks that this specialist wrote the artifact below. Under the full governance regime a missing artifact fails the step.
review_technical.md
Skills it loads
Where it runs
In the showcase run this reviewer scored the draft 6.5 of 10.
Description
Data model- Discipline
- Economics
- Method family
- Review
- Design
- not specified
- Research stage
- Review
- Contributors
- E2ER contributors (Software, Methodology)
- Usage
- used in 2 templates · 1 published study · Examples: 3 example studies
- Source
- E2ER repository · src/core/specialists/registry.py · @3b91f0e
- Record
- agent:technical_reviewer · JSON
Solid tags are declared by the source or mapped from its terms; dashed tags are inferred by a published rule. Hover a tag for its provenance.