Academic Writing Review Checklist
Good academic writing in economics is clear, precise, and efficient. It serves the argument -- it does not draw attention to itself. The goal is to communicate complex ideas so that a busy reader (a referee with 30 papers on their desk) can follow your logic without rereading sentences. This checklist identifies the most common writing problems in economics manuscripts and provides concrete guidan
Where it sits
left: what it builds on · right: what builds on it · pale: exampleContributed by E2ER contributors
How studies reach it
- No Cash Flows, New Owners: Spot Bitco… → Academic Writing Review Checklist
- Digital credit scores and lending to … → Empirical → writing_reviewer → Academic Writing Review ChecklistExample
- Stablecoins and the cost of remittanc… → Empirical → writing_reviewer → Academic Writing Review ChecklistExample
- Remote work and promotion chances → Empirical → writing_reviewer → Academic Writing Review ChecklistExample
- Mobile money and household savings in… → Staggered difference-in-differences (… → Empirical → writing_reviewer → Academic Writing Review ChecklistExample
- Data-sharing mandates and hospital IT… → Staggered difference-in-differences (… → Empirical → writing_reviewer → Academic Writing Review ChecklistExample
and 13 more
Disciplines it reaches
Solid: published studies. Light: examples.
Computed from the records on this site: what each study, template and specialist names as used, which study extends which, and who contributed what. 19 studies in total.
Provenance
- Project
- E2ER bundled skills
- Maintained by
- E2ER contributors
- Licence
- MIT
- Source file
- bhanneke/E2ER-project/blob/orgsci-mvp/skills/files/review/writing-quality.md
- Identifier
- e2er/review/writing-quality
Use it
Ships with every installation of E2ER.
Used by
Evaluations
PlannedNo evaluation record yet. An evaluation shows where a skill breaks before others rely on it.
Evaluate this skillDescription
Data model- Discipline
- Economics
- Method family
- not specified
- Design
- not specified
- Research stage
- Review
- Contributors
- E2ER contributors (Software, Methodology)
- Usage
- used in 2 templates · 1 published study · loaded by 1 specialist · Examples: 3 example studies
- Source
- E2ER repository · skills/files · @3b91f0e
- Record
- skill:e2er/review/writing-quality · JSON
Solid tags are declared by the source or mapped from its terms; dashed tags are inferred by a published rule. Hover a tag for its provenance.